
Team 3 v Haddington 3 – Division 2
Line-up: Kristian Skotzen, Bob Porteous, and Charlie Brindley
Team 3 are still mathematically in the hunt for promotion but know that they need to win their remaining games and hope that the second placed team in the division have a nightmare finish to the season. When in the first round of singles matches, both Kristian and Charlie suffered 4 end defeats, they were in trouble. But when matches 4 and 5 went the way of the visitors, they took the lead 3-2. A loss for Bob in Match 6, however, sent the game into the doubles fixture all square. Kristian and Charlie combined for an important win to give the visitors the advantage. Wins for Kristian and Charlie in matches 8 and 9 secured the points for the Penicuik side and Bob made the score a little more convincing with a 12-10 in the fifth win in Match 10. A 7-3 win perhaps flattered the visitors a little.
Team 5 v Haddington 5 – Division 4
Line-up: Roscoe Cairney, Mat Dyluk & Jay Jayalath
Team 5 travelled East with some trepidation, having lost the reverse fixture 10-0 at Ladywood. It was a different story on this occasion. Wins for Jay and Roscoe in matches 2 and 3 gave the visitors a 2-1 lead after the first round of singles matches. Only one of the next three singles, however, was won by the visitors as the scores were level going into the doubles. Jay and Mat took to the table (perhaps a little surprising) and when they fell to a 4-end defeat, the Penicuik side knew they were in trouble. Roscoe lost match 8 but a terrific win for Mat kept the match alive. Could Jay pull off a win to secure a draw in the final match of the night? Not quite as he fell to a four-end defeat and with that Haddington took the spoils with a 6-4 victory.
Team 1 v Haddington 1 – Premier Division – 13th March
Line-up: Colin Green, Peter Aird, and Ryan Docherty
Ryan got the visitors off to a great start with a 3-1 victory over Pete Lugton. When Colin did likewise in match 2 against Carsten Giebeler and that was followed by a win for Peter v Matt Monro, it was a perfect start for the visitors. Ryan couldn’t quite get over the line in his second match losing 11-9 in the fifth to Carsten and when Haddington’s Peter defeated Penicuik’s Peter in Match 5, the comeback was on for the hosts. Any hopes of that comeback were wiped out, however, as the Midlothian side took the next five matches for an excellent 8-2 win.
Ladywood 13th March - Penicuik 2 v Murrayfield 8 – Division 2
Team 2 welcomed back Ian Hislop from one of his many trips abroad and he was straight into the team to join James Wighton and Krzysztof Laszkiewicz at Ladywood for the visit of Murrayfield 8. Match 1 saw Ian take on Lyn Somerville and if ever there was an advert for the expedite system to come into play, this was it – no one could remember the rules though so on they went for about 50 minutes, only for Ian to lose 11-9 in the fifth! When James lost match 2, this looked like being a difficult night for the hosts. Four of the next five matches, however, went the way of the Penicuik side as they took a 4-3 lead with the last round of singles matches left to play. Match 8 proved pivotal – James v Phillipe Almichel went the distance to a fifth end, Phillipe recovering from 2-0 down – words of wisdom from Ian at the break before the final end seemed to work wonders for James – an 11-1 fifth end win saw a point secured and that became 2 points when Krzysztof won match 9. 3 wins for him, 1 each for James and Ian and a crucial doubles win saw the 6-4 specialists do it again!
Penicuik 4 v Murrayfield 9 – Division 3
Meanwhile, Rachel Petrie, Chamika Diyunugalge and Phil Daly (playing up for the absent Patrick Shanks) faced Murrayfield 9 in Division 3. Chamika had a fantastic night – two 3-1 wins and a 3-2 win were combined with a 3-1 win for him and Rachel in the doubles – 4 on the board for the hosts. Unfortunately, in a match that probably should have resulted in a win, the only other victory on the night came in match 9 for Rachel. A 5-5 draw for the understrength Penicuik side sent both teams home moderately happy.
Player of the Week
It’s a tricky one this week. Krzysztof was undefeated in yet another exciting 6-4 victory for Team 2. Colin played some lovely stuff for Team 1 and Chamika secured 4 wins in a 5-5 draw for Team 4. Add to that solid performances from Kristian, Charlie, Bob, Peter, Jay and Ryan who all won 2 out of 3 and this really is a difficult decision. In the end, this player’s contribution was vital to his team avoiding a defeat – 4 wins in a 5-5 draw deserves to be rewarded – well done to Chamika.
Controversy of the Week
We’ve got plenty to talk about this week! Let’s start with Team 2’s match at Ladywood. In the doubles, there were tense exchanges between Team Captain James and the umpire, his own teammate, Ian! One of the Murrayfield players, whilst serving, threw the ball up in the air, it went at a bad angle and he simply caught the ball again on its way down, presumably because he was unhappy with his throw-up. Point to Penicuik claims James. Why says the umpire – he didn’t try to strike the ball! So, what says James, you’re not umpiring a tennis match, this is table tennis. Oh dear!! It’s Ok though, the Murrayfield players must know the rule. James was staggered when all three players from the Edinburgh Club claimed not to know that what happened was a fault. Really? The League Secretary was one of the opponents – surely, he knows the rules? Apparently not! Dumfounded James was left raging and needed his partner to calm him down and tell him to carry on and forget about it! It’s a good job the doubles was fairly straightforward – imagine if it had been a deuce in the fifth loss!! Remarkably the same player did the same thing in the next end, this time apparently throwing the ball up before his partner was ready and then catching it! James just looked at umpire Ian who remained stony-faced! There are numerous different paragraphs of the rules we could look at – but lets just concentrate on this one:
"The ball shall be in play from the last moment at which it is stationary on the palm of the free hand before being intentionally projected upwards.".
Ball in play, a proper serve needs to be performed. Catching the ball is not a proper serve. Unless of course the service was interrupted, and a let was called – that wasn’t the case here – the server intentionally started his serve. Ah well, perhaps our League Head Umpire needs to role out his umpiring course to a few more people – including folk from our own Club!
In the other half of the hall on Thursday night, there was an interesting query raised by Rachel. In her first match of the night against her young opponent, she started brilliantly with an 11-4 first end win. At the end of that set, her opponent took himself out of the hall (to the toilet) and whilst he was gone, Rachel queried whether that was allowed?? Not a situation which we have come across before bizarrely – the rule which seems to apply is that "Players may not leave the playing area during a match without the permission of the umpire”. Clearly if a toilet break is needed then it’s needed, more so we would have thought for us old codgers who may have some bladder control issues! A drugs test was suggested when the youngster returned and comfortably won the next three ends!!
Away in Haddington on Tuesday night, Team 3 were involved in a very good spirited match with their East Lothian Opponents – the same could not be said for the match taking place beside Team 3 as Haddington 1 took on West Lothian 2. At one point, the noise coming from the match was so ridiculous that Kristian felt he should really go over and get involved. The youngsters of West Lothian can be exuberant, but on this occasion the complaint was about a couple of them shouting, screaming and their use of foul, vulgar language. Such behaviour is simply unacceptable and needs to be stamped out – it’s as clear as day on the back of our match cards that such conduct is a yellow card offence – no sign of any card being given. We spoke to the nicest man in table tennis, Pete Lugton, after the match and he commented that it was certainly not a pleasant match to play in. He felt that those in charge at WL need to take some control of the situation. One of the other players from Haddington who had to play against the extremely poor bahaviour found himself completely and utterly put off by the conduct, so much so, that he ended up not caring in the fifth end. He rightly pointed out that such conduct is not acceptable in school, at work, in the supermarket etc. so why is it in TT. A good question. Of course, what should happen is that the conduct is addressed on the night – we’re fairly sure that if yellow or red cards start to be given out, this type of conduct would stop. Difficult of course if it’s your own teammate that’s umpiring!!
The season is speeding towards its conclusion – only a couple of matches left for most of our teams – roll on Week 25.